Posts
It's Official... According to ABC...
... Universal Health Care is indeed an evil plot!
A plot hatched by alien lizard-people from another planet bent on world domination and destruction!
The premiere of "V" said so! Not so far from the truth?
In the past, pro-life pregnancy centers in Maryland almost became required to discourage potential clients by telling them they did not have to tell the truth. That bill was defeated.
Now, a slightly less (but still discouraging) bill may be passed today in Baltimore City that seeks to do much the same. It would require such centers to post signage that they do not provide or refer for abortions, or birth control. It is evidently party of an effort by Planned Parenthood to discourage the use of their "competition". The bill is due to be voted on today.
While
it may not seem too ominous, note that very rarely is an organization
required to state what they do NOT do. Does your gas station have to
state that they do not rebuild transmissions? Does the local hamburger
joint have to say they do not serve steak? Of course not. What's to
stop the list of things "we don't do" being expanded to procedures
filling reams and reams of paper? Could the hamburger joint eventually
be required to say they don't rebuild transmissions?
Are Planned Parenthood organizations required to tell potential clients that they do not "lovingly help you give birth to a healthy baby and give you resources to be able to raise the child yourself"? Are they required to tell these women that they "will not help you through the pre-natal period and will not help you develop an adoption plan for your new baby"?
This legislation is unfairly targeting one type of pregnancy center (the pro-life kind), and not the pro-abortion version.
The wacky lefties have scheduled a mock unemployment line at Sen. Mikulski's Annapolis offices today at 2PM. They are using the bad news that the unemployment rate has hit 9.8% for their own, twisted purposes. Ironically, they are using it to call for the passage of "President Obama's clean energy jobs plan and the 1.7 million new jobs it would create." They really buy into the biodegradable bull (droppings) that these so-called "clean" jobs will ever come into reality, while ignoring the many real-and-existing jobs cap 'n trade will take away. Gee, did they ever think that the high unemployment rate might be related to the leftist policies they tout? Nah, certainly it couldn't be that.
... will they judge the competitions "The Chicago Way" with tilted, illegal votes?
... will Acorn be in charge of picking the judges, or tallying the scores?
... will Oprah fund the needed infrastructure improvements to Chi-Town out of her pocket change?
... will Saul Alinsky be in charge of security?
... will the Rev. Wright give the opening invocation?
... will the Olympic flag replace Old Glory as the official banner of the US of A?
... will the nebulous, feel-good rhetoric of "Global Unity" wipe-out "Don't Tread on Me" patriotism?
Our dear friends at "Soros Takeover of America, Inc.", otherwise known as "Move-On", have ramped up their astroturfing. Here's a bit from their recent e-mail missives (with my comments interspersed in parenthesis):
Dear MoveOn member, It's getting ugly out there.
All across the country, right-wing extremists are disrupting congressional town-hall meetings with venomous attacks on President Obama's plans for health care and clean energy.
(Nothing about the left-wing extremists that have done likewise in the past?)
- Last night in Tampa, Florida, a town hall meeting erupted into violence, with the police being called to break up fist fights and shoving matches. (Nothing about the Police being called when Union Goons beat-up patriotic American dissenters?)
- A Texas Democrat was shouted down by right-wing hecklers, many of whom admitted they didn't even live in his district.2 (So what, they still care and know these legislators can vote on these important issues. What difference does it make what district you are in, if we all will be impacted by their votes?)
- One North Carolina representative announced he wouldn't be holding any town-hall meetings after his office began receiving death threats.3 (Not excusable, but where was their indignation during the Bush era when he was threatened?)
- And in Maryland, protesters hung a Democratic congressman in effigy to oppose health-care reform.4 (A bit much, but at least now Franky Krataval now knows what G.Bush had to go through.)
(Wait just a (blue-)dogg-gone minute...you HIRED people to organize your volunteers? They are not all really grassroots regular Americans concerned enough about the issue to show up without your prodding? Hmmmm.)
But we need to scale up our efforts quickly to make sure this plan works. To really swing into action during this month's congressional recess, we need to raise at least $250,000 immediately. Can you chip in $25 to support our work?
If the shouts of the right-wing mobs are the only voices our senators and representatives hear over the recess, we'll have a hard time passing health care and clean energy legislation.(Sounds like a good thing to me!)
That's why we're launching our Heat Up Congress campaign so quickly to fight back, using new technology to implement rapid
response town hall turnout, organizing personal phone calls from small business leaders and donors to their representatives,
running new ads, and activating an energized network of on-the-ground organizers and volunteers.
( I do envy your Community Organizing skills, I'll give you that.)
This month could decide the future of health care and clean energy in America—and we're already one week in. If you've been sitting on the sidelines, now's the time to get involved. Talk to your neighbors, go to a town hall meeting—and today, please chip in $25 to support our work:
Thanks for all you do.
–Justin, Matt, Nita, Kat and the rest of the team
(Locally, they are also trying to thwart the Capital Newspaper's policy against organized letter-writing campaigns. See below)
Right-wing mobs aren't just disrupting congressional town halls—their outlandish lies are now making their way into
mainstream news coverage, too.
(Well, it's about time. Your outlandish lies have been in the mainstream media for years!)
We need to set the record straight. The majority of Americans support real health care reform. And no wonder, given the incredible cost of inaction.
In Maryland alone, 230 people lose their coverage every day. And for those with
insurance, yearly premiums will hit $22,225 in a few years if we don't act.
(I'd like to see the source of those stats.)
We can't let right-wing extremists ruin the biggest opportunity in a generation to get real
reform. Can you send a quick letter to the editor of The Capital—or another local paper—about
the urgent need in Maryland for Congress to pass health care reform with a real public option?
Click here: (Link Removed by Chester)
If you've never written a letter to the editor before, now is the time
to send your first. The letters page is one of the most widely read—and
most important—in local newspapers. Members of Congress and their
staffs read it to understand how their constituents are feeling. And since members are all home in the district this month—and
paying close attention to the health care debate in particular—your letter will make an even bigger impact.
Here are some talking points specific to Maryland you can use in your letter:
- We can't afford to wait for reform: Each day, 230 people in Maryland lose their health care coverage. And without reform, those who still have insurance will see their yearly premiums go up by $9,201 in the next decade—to a staggering $22,225.
- Reform with a real public option is key to expanding coverage: Under current legislation, which includes a strong public health insurance option, 616,000 people in Maryland—and 37 million Americans nationwide1—will gain coverage by 2019.
- A real public health insurance option is crucial to lowering costs: With premiums projected to hit $22,225, we need to get costs down. By spurring competition, a public plan will help bring down out-of-control costs2 for individuals, families, and small businesses. (Uh... See comment above!)
(And that's not supposed to cost more, or result in care-rationing... what have they been smoking?)
Thanks for all you do.
–Nita, Kat, Eli, Wes, and the rest of the team
Something's Fishy? He really does not want to go there...
Barry O's official website, the one we pay for with our tax dollars, is now stooping to insulting Americans who are exercising their right to free speech. But that is not all, they are now recruiting neighbor to tattle on neighbor. People are being asked to report "fishy" e-mails and websites that dare question the official "truths" about the health care plan. Despite the dangers of Goodwin's Law, it is very hard to hear such things without visions of brown-shirted thugs bursting in and demanding if we are hiding any Jews. (Anne Frank & Corrie Ten-Boom, may they rest in peace).
The Audacity (I use that word on purpose) of the White House to entice people to squeal because they can't monitor such things themselves. Yeah, right! They have the whole freakin' NSA at their disposal, or they can do a Google Alert, they know what is being said about them. They just don't like what they are hearing. They just don't like this "Inconvenient Truth" (again, words chosen on purpose). Since when are Americans exercising their right to free political speech "fishy"? Do they really want to go there?
When the TV program Jericho went off the air with the word "Nuts" being used, thousands of fans protested by sending nuts to the powers-that-be, and the program was renewed for another (shorter) season. Underwear (clean, or dirty?) was supposedly sent by some to protest women being attacked for drinking in a bar. Recently, tea bags were sent to Congress in protest. New Zealand farmers protesting a global warming "flatulence tax" sent even worse items, if you can guess what I mean.
Does Barry really want to go there... really?? I can see postal workers across America dealing with tons of stinky fish being sent to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. Tuna cans are too heavy, but rotting anchovies stinking through the envelopes... yeach! If they thought some websites and e-mails were "fishy", they ain't seen nothin' yet!
From the Presser: (Italicized Comments Mine)
GOVERNOR MARTIN O’MALLEY DELIVERS KEYNOTE ADDRESS BEFORE THE MARYLAND MUNICIPAL LEAGUE
O’Malley highlights Maryland’s progress as product of choice, not chance
Ocean City, MD June 30, 2009 - Governor Martin O’Malley delivered the keynote address tonight before the Maryland Municipal League, a membership association of city and town governments through the State. During his address, the Governor highlighted Maryland’s progress, even during difficult economic times, and the choices that produced such progress.
“Maryland is once again that center State, leading the way in times of great adversity, better positioned than other states to pick ourselves up from off the mat, and power through this recession,” said Governor O’Malley. “I would submit to you that this is no accident. Our progress together is a product not of chance, but of choice. We’ve made tough choices to protect the hardworking families of our State – choices that are allowing us to make our government work again for every family in Maryland.”
(Excuse Me, but if we are picking ourselves off the mat, why do we need so many Federal dollars to survive?)
Noting the challenging economic times that all local leaders must navigate their respective jurisdictions through, the Governor acknowledged that “the hardworking families of our State need and deserve a government that works for them. I would arguer that never have they needed us more. In these times, when we face both great challenges and great opportunities, the stakes are too high to leave our future up to chance.”
(Do they need a government that works for them, or do they need to work for the government? It seems only the latter will have any jobs. More self-importance of big-government being needed. Instead of leaving recovery up to chance, how about leaving it up to the free market, bud?!)
Governor O’Malley asked the audience to imagine Maryland five years from now, asking “What kind of State do we want to be in five years? What sort of future will we choose for Maryland?”
(Hmmm... I hope it will see you and your new B.F.F. at 1600 Pa Avenue out in the unemployment line, and true leaders running the place who know what "Freedom", "Liberty", and "Security" really mean!)
“We can admit to each other tonight that we don’t have all the answers about how that future will look,” said Governor O’Malley. “But there are some things that we do know. We know that the choices we make today will have a direct effect on the kind of State we will be tomorrow. And we know the costs of inaction.”
(So, you admit you don't have the answers, but want to be in control of every aspect of our lives anyway? Riiiight.... that seems so wise of us to let you do that... in a pig's eye!)
The Governor highlighted extraordinary signs of progress that set Maryland apart from many other states, including Education Magazine’s ranking of Maryland’s public schools as number one in the nation, saying, “It’s not by chance, but by choice that today our students’ test scores are on the rise in every county, in every grade, in every subject and across every single demographic line.” The Governor noted that our choices today can elevate our public schools to a position of global leadership.
(Again, no mention of the work of Nancy Grasmick, what a class act to take credit for someone else's achievements!)
Maryland’s economy has weathered the national recession better than many other States. Governor O’Malley outlined the choices that have allowed Maryland’s high-tech and high-potential sectors such as life sciences to thrive even in difficult economic times. “We know that we can create jobs and grow our economy if we choose to support and invest in bio and aero and green technology; if we have the courage to set and defend our goals for creating and protecting hundreds of thousands of Maryland jobs in growth sectors, and we choose to reawaken a newfound commitment to science, technology, engineering and math education.”
(Yeah, right... create Green jobs for your cronies (cough... windpower) while killing many more jobs for those "hardworking families of our State" you falsely profess to care about!)
The Governor also highlighted ways the State has strengthened the safety net for Maryland’s working families, passing sweeping foreclosure reforms, expanding health care coverage, and standing up for Maryland’s energy ratepayers. “We know that we can continue to protect our hardworking families if we choose to put our families first in these difficult times,” said Governor O’Malley.
(Let's take these one at a time. Foreclosure Reforms: So, you are hurting the hardworking families who work for mortgage companies by not letting them collect on bad debt. You hurt private people from helping those in arrears save some equity in their homes buy buying them before foreclosure, giving the family time to find a place they can afford... a win for the bank, the mortgage rescuer, and the family that would be out on the street... now that is all gone! Expanding Health Care Coverage: You either force those small businesses who can't afford it to offer it anyway, or you force the taxpayer to pay for it... while expanding the definition of dependents of state employees to include same-sex-couples, at a great cost to the taxpayer once again! Standing up for Maryland's Energy Ratepayers: You gotta be frickin kidding me!! You can say that with a straight face? You have done little to reduce energy costs, and thanks to your efforts, and those of that B.F.F. of yours again, they will... what is the term he used.... "Skyrocket"!!)
Also noting Maryland’s progress on the environment, Governor O’Malley said “We know that if we have the courage to set tangible, achievable goals and to hold our efforts open and accountable, we can save our waterways. We can grow smarter. We can create hundreds of thousands of new jobs. We can reduce our energy consumption and increase our use of renewable energy.”
(These goals are not goals, but requirements. They are neither tangible nor achievable, and you wouldn't know what "open and accountable" was if it bit you where the sun don't shine! There's that allusion to the imaginary "hundreds of thousands of new jobs", while you are killing existing, real jobs that existing, real people work at! While encouraging renewable energy is commendable, requiring it, even though it is expensive, is not. The real goal is not replacing existing energy with renewables, but you admit it is reducing energy consumption. You'll do that, all right, if it means cap and taxing us into the stone age!)
Noting the importance of state and local partnerships to
maintain and build upon this progress, Governor O’Malley concluded his remarks:
“Throughout the
375 year history of Maryland, as a people we’ve been confronted
with a timeless question: Will we allow our circumstances to change us, or will
we work together to change our circumstances? What type of State will we be in
5 years? The choice is ours.”
(The choice is only "ours" if by that you mean your audience at the time, government workers. Their bosses, the Citizens, will be left with little choice, and little freedom!)
A voluntary, nonprofit, nonpartisan association controlled and maintained by city and town governments, the Maryland Municipal League (MML) works to strengthen the role and capacity of municipal government through research, legislation, technical assistance, training and the dissemination of information for its members. Through its membership in the National League of Cities MML offers legislative representation in Washington, urban research programs, and a national municipal government information exchange. MML is the only statewide organization in Maryland composed solely of municipal officials and devoted to the promotion of all branches of municipal administration.
(Wow! There's the admission that the organization is tasked with promoting big government! See terms like "strengthen the role and capacity of municipal government", or "devoted to the promotion of all branches of municipal administration"... Where is the organization charged with limiting the role of Government intrusion in our lives?)
The Anne Arundel Republican Central Committee has been tasked with a tough job, picking Senator Janet Greenip's successor. Depending on what they do, they could also have a hand in reshaping the House of Delegates, and the County Council as well. The following is not to be considered an official endorsement, just my own opinion.
Let's see who have been mentioned as contenders, commenting on each.
Cathy Vitale and "Big Ed' Reilly have been mentioned from the County Council. Unlike the Capital newspaper, I do not see these as the "most promising" for the position. Both are hard workers on the Council, but that is an entirely different position than the state legislature. Council members deal with zoning, school budgets, potholes and traffic, the nitty-gritty of local life. State legislators deal more with the "big ideas" of abortion, illegals, the environment, and other state-wide issues. Success in one does not mean success in the other. What record on these big issues do Cathy and Ed have? We have little to base a decision on in these areas. I would hope the Committee would chose from other worthy candidates, and leave the Council alone. There is, however, still a way for one of these, or another, council member to "move up" (in quotes because I see it as a different, not superior, position). More on that later.
Dave Boshert is a great guy, with state experience, but he lost out to John Leopold for the County Executive position and hasn't been in the legislature (except as a lobbyist) for a while. If he were to get back in the game, I would hope it would be as a Delegate, not leap-frogging over existing delegates for the Senate job.
I agree with the Crab-Wrapper (Capital Newspaper) that Delegate Bob Costa's strength may be more in South County than the rest of the Senator's district.
If it comes down to Delegates King and McConkey, I choose the latter, since Tony McConkey is the senior delegate from the region. He also has not only the state experience, but the state record, as a socially-conservative, pro-life legislator, much like Janet Greenip herself. It would be foolish to risk losing the support of the conservatives who put Janet in office by picking someone with a less-than stellar conservative record. Tony has this record, other potential suitors may not.
Of course, If McConkey gets the nod, there will be an opening in the House. Here's where it can get interesting. Should that opening go to Vitale? While she is also from Severna Park, and I'm sure her constituent services will shine as always, I just do not see the logic in assuming Council members would make state good legislators. My concerns over a lack of a state/big-issue record is still valid. If we are going to go with that, what about fellow blogger Greg Kline? He at least ran for the Delegate job, does he still want it? My understanding is that he is a social conservative as well, which bodes well for retaining McConkey's supporters.
So, in conclusion: McConkey keeps the conservative Janet supporters, and Kline keeps Tony's conservative supporters as well. The County Council is left intact to do what it does best, dealing with the nitty-gritty of local life, while the State Legislature retains its conservative voices, sorely needed when confronting O'Malley, Miller, & Busch.
One Post-Script: As the County Council debates the slots zoning issue, will they decide it before the Cent.Com. makes it's own decision? I can see either or both sides of the slots debate wanting their least-favorite council member to move on to the House or Senate, hoping someone more favorable to their cause gets picked to fill the Council vacancy that would result. We don't need lobbying of the Central Committee by either pro (or anti) slots interests to muddy the waters even more.
Prez Should Heed Andrew Lloyd Weber's Warning from Across the Pond
The brit has some serious concerns about the UK chasing all of it's wealth-creators out of the country. Martin O'Malley could learn a thing or two from him as well.
Do you get all Kum-ba-ya and filled with the warm glow of "Bipartisanship"?
More likely, (like last night at Sine Die) you get a bill so screwed up that neither side likes it. Many on both sides voted against it, those who are in favor of coddling illegals, or those who want to ship them south. Unfortunately, even the rightys and the wrongys/leftys were outnumbered (barely) by those who actually passed this steaming pile of stuff. The drivers-licenses-for-illegals debate we were led to believe would be one of either strict adherence to the letter (if not the spirit) of the law, or a two-tiered contraption.
What we got, thanks to a conference committee, was a monstrosity that gets tough on those illegals... in 2015?! What the hey? That is touted as dealing with this situation on a "date certain", a date that is way overdue. That will be 14 years after 9-11! Yeah, that's gettin' tough alright! My foot it is! The illegal sympathizers are not happy either, I guess they feel 2015 is being too tough. It stops future "undocumented" immigrants from getting new licenses, how very mean of us!?
It passed, but with not enough votes to be considered an "emergency" piece of legislation. So it will take place June 1st. What a laugh if it had been considered an "emergency" that doesn't kick in 'til 2015. Talk about oxy-moronic!
Please people, come out to the Tea Parties. Predicted rain is no excuse! Even if you have to wear 2 raincoats and carry 3 umbrellas, we gotta stop this insanity!
ADDENDUM: Martin Watcher commented over at Red Maryland, and it is important those comments be reproduced here to get more of the story...
Chester,
The talking point that this is a bill that was altered so much that both sides of the issue didn't like it is a talking point pushed by the Baltimore Sun and rest of the main stream media to make it look like real compromise took place. The reality is, the vote between the bill last night and the original 2-tier system wanted by the House was 2 votes. Yeah, 2 whole votes changed in the House. On the Senate side, ALL of the liberal Dems that voted against the No Illegal Immigrant license bill gladly voted for this bill, and only 2 conservative Dems stood their ground.The reality of the whole thing was, they changed the bill just enough to provide coverage for the Senate to completely switch.
April 14, 2009 4:44 PM
Oh, I see...
While I agree that the bill is junk, I am not persuaded that it is a real compromise. I see it as a mess-by-committee. I did not understand that they were sneaky enough to have so many (otherwise liberal) legislators vote against it on purpose so they could "claim" it is a real compromise.Man these politicians tick me off. I wasn't privy to the Senate stuff, but was just was amazed by the wide range of people voting against it in the House.
I think the talking point is valid, neither side did like it, but the lefts disappointment as a political tool, that I was oblivious to. Thanks to your insight.
I now have to update my post on my blog to reflect this.